The first characteristic that emerges when you start using Mellel is how fast the application reacts to actions. I attribute it to its being based on XML. The second is how styles are organised. Paragraph and character styles are separate entities, so I can have one paragraph style for quotations and different character styles for Italian, English (UK), Catalan… And there are page styles, too. In regard to both features, Mellel drifts apart from Nisus, which is based on RTF and has a more standard approach to styles.
It’s hard on everyone to start using a word processor from scratch, but many documents cannot be written in plain text. It’d be worse to pay a monthly subscription to Adobe or to buy a QuarkXPress 2015 one-time license. In my opinion, Mellel is well worth the effort.
There are two big reasons to take a peek at Quark’s capabilities: integration with XML and exporting to EPUB. However, Quark can be used as a regular page layout application, in other words, when the accuracy and power of the usual suspects (Word, LibreOffice, Pages, Nisus Writer…) isn’t enough.
I feel sorry for Nisus Writer people, but Mellel (38,99€ at the Mac App Store) has just made a huge step forward: in the middle of June its sibling application for iPad came to light (19,99€ a l’App Store). According to its presentation on the web, there is “complete fidelity” between the documents on the two platforms.
Mellel is a text processor intended to handle long documents, even if they are written in non-Latin alphabets. One Mellel’s functionality that seems to be ahead of what Nisus Writer offers is the management of word partitions. We’ll have to buy both applications to assess their virtues by ourselves.
Thanks to a post on Macdrifter blog, I’ve come to know that a group of independent developers have got together to offer a 25% save on their apps. There’s a code you have to use to get the discount: SUMMERFEST2015. Here is the link:
I could talk a lot about Nisus Writer, Scrivener and Bookends, which I already own and use, and about Take Control books, but there’s an app in the list I’ve been waiting for: Aeon Timeline. It’s used to build timelines, namely, sequences of tokens in a line of time. These tokens can store images (maybe other media too). Timelines are useful when studying history, but they can be used to classify other types of contents, too.
There’s a Scrivener template which makes possible to sync a Scrivener project with a timeline in Aeon Timeline. That template has been talked over in the Scrivener users group in Google+.
Well, then, the Summerfest 2015 sale is a good way to step forward and try a few new apps, if not one. I’m already at it.
One can’t quite understand there isn’t an iOS app parallel to Mac OS X’s Preview. In the current state of things, in order to have PDF documents available on desktop and mobile devices, one has to use a folder from any iOS application intended to manage PDFs.
And such apps are a bunch. Personally, I own PDFpen 2 and GoodReader. Another app well recognised is PDF Expert 5, by Readdle. Allegedly, the lack of a PDF viewer from Apple opens the door to third party actors and allows them to work whitout the competition of the mother company. However, there we have the e-mail and the browser apps. I use iCab Mobile more and more as a Safari alternative, either in the iPad or the iPhone, and that doesn’t mean Safari shouldn’t exist. As for e-mail, I haven’t tried anything different from the Apple’s own yet, but I could and many have done it.
So then, what’s the matter? Isn’t dealing with PDFs a service of the same rank than e-mail and web browsing? What I said in the title: a mystery.
A week ago Ulysses III turned into just Ulysses (44,99€) and simultaneously its sibling Ulysses for iPad (19,99€) was born. The similarity between both is impressive. An area with margin to improve in the iOS application is a better handling of files and folders in Dropbox or similar services. On the iPad, we can even use a customised RTF style (or epub, or PDF) created on the Mac.
The Ulysses case and the level of integration between operating systems as of today makes me think this is the track to follow in the development of applications – at least it’s what I’d like to witness. Of course I know Textastic and Byword already have full integration between desktop and mobile versions. I meant text processors and Scrivener. It may not be a matter of being able to write seamlessly in the two environments, but rather that some preferences match and don’t need to be manually replicated.
Obviously, Ulysses can afford to integrate both applications because it’s based on plain text. Other programmes like Nisus Writer and Pages include such a number of format parameters that we can’t ask them to do the same. It wouldn’t be fair. However, Apple has set the process in motion with Pages, Keynote and Numbers. The results aren’t yet satisfactory enough, but, if it’s any consolation, they’re working on it.